Results tagged “Gold Coast” from Knife Catchers

Guess who's back? Our old friend the unsellable 1626 Alameda Avenue! It now sports a shiny new lower price ($925,000) to go with its new MLS(r) ID (40453300) and its new agent (Andrea Gordon, picking up after Carol Burnett; whose site is down; here's a cached copy).

1628_alameda_avenue_mine.jpgPlease refer to the original post for details, or Chez Neumansky's detailed tour summary for a first-hand account of the place.



Price drop summary and notable listings

|
There's been a fair amount of activity lately, what with the renewal of the irresponsible tax credit and idiot agents cheering for the second coming. Here's a messy summary of interesting happenings in our little town.

  • 452 Santa Clara: here's a bank that's not messing around. 31 photos, nice property, 2,800+sqft Victorian fourplex, REO, listed super aggressively for $400,000. It'll be gone for way over asking in just a few days.
  • 2267 Clinton is back, yet again, with a puny price drop (now down to $1,369,000). The idiot perma-sellers will never get their asking price and are wasting everybody's time. Remember this is the listing that claimed rents were rising just a year ago in spite of a mountain of evidence to the contrary.
  • 3246 Liberty is a very pretty, large bungalow in a part of town that has people go ga-ga and overpay on a regular basis. This is one of the larger houses on that block, and it's priced comparably to what smaller bungalows were listed for this year ($599,000). Still too much, but some idiot buyer will probably pay that much.
  • 1312 San Antonio is an expensive Tudor on a tiny lot in an excellent Gold Coast location. A short sale at $819,000 (previous transaction $869,000 in late 2005), it's unlikely to sell for over $800,000.
  • A cute little Victorian 891 Oak Street just dropped its price from $575,000 to $475,000 in one fell swoop after remaining unsold for over a year. It's now a short sale.
  • The unsellable duplex at 1626 Alameda Avenue dropped its price by a whole $1,000, to $942,000. Lovely price history:
03/24/09 -- $1,145,000 to $1,095,000
05/12/09 -- $1,095,000 to $1,049,000
06/23/09 -- $1,049,000 to $999,000
07/23/09 -- $999,000 to $950,000
08/25/09 -- $950,000 to $945,000
09/21/09 -- $945,000 to $943,000
10/25/09 -- $943,000 to $942,000
  • 1304 Morton is finally pending! What price did the stubborn kitchen-pimping sellers accept? We shall see.

A glance at Zip Realty will indicate the market is still littered with listings in various stages of foreclosures, and the market appears to be poised for a second wild ride starting early next year with tens of billions of dollars in bad loans coming home to roost (notice the inverse shape of the graph below and the Case-Shiller home price index):

mortgage-reset-chart-eye-of-the-hurricaine.jpg

Yes, I did use the word "idiot" an inordinate number of times in this post.

Rumor has it listing your house with one (or more) 8s in the price brings good luck. Or something. The sellers of 1112 Union St aren't taking any chances with their (new) price of $738,888. In addition to a prime location, this property has the following specs:

3 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 1,450 sqft, 3,625-sqft lot, MLS(r) #40421736, $738,888 ($518 / sqft)

[...] craftsman's jewel of yesteryear. [...] wonderful example of old world craftsmanship [...] highly finished wood trims and handcrafted built-ins, clinker brick & stone fireplaces, to the gourmet cooks kitchen and period bath you will be amazed at the level of exquisite detail. [...] relax with a glass of wine in the jetted spa or entertain on your expansive hand laid brick patio. [...]
It's currently for sale on Zillow for $749,000, but the local MLS(r) listing does not show a price drop, so who knows what the story is.

1112-union-zillow.jpg
The house appears to be absolutely gorgeous inside and out, except for the Terminator kitchen, but de gustibus etc.:

1112-union-keiko.jpg
(significantly resized screenshot used under fair use doctrine)

That said, it's on the small side, only has one bathroom, and the lot is tiny. And at $518 / sqft it's still significantly overpriced. The sale history suggests the sellers should have some room to drop the price to where it belongs, unless they've financed all those renovations by borrowing against the house.

Last sale and tax info

Sold 04/24/1998: $217,000
2008 Property Tax: $3,750
Let's hope all those 8s bring good luck, because they're going to need it.

Sorry for the low post volume this week; not very many interesting listings coming on the market. Mostly relists like...

  • 1527 Willow St (MLS(r) #40398697, $724,500), covered a month ago;
  • 1626 Alameda Ave (MLS(r) #40398582, $1,145,000) with a new agent. The listing is always in ALL CAPS regardless of the agent representing the house, so I'm guessing the owner might have some control issues evidenced by their lack of sale in something like 10 years or more of trying to unload their "mansion";
  • 538 Palace Ct (MLS(r) #40398372, $435,000), a sad, unrecognizably Victorian "duplex" I didn't have the heart to cover last year because it's so sad looking;
  • 1612 Minturn St (MLS(r) #40398229, $545,000), covered a couple of months ago.
One relist I didn't cover is 1611 San Antonio, at the same idiotic high price at which it failed to sell last year:

$1059000 / 4br - Fabulous Gold Coast Property ~OPEN SUN~. 2PM-4:00PM (alameda) (map)


Reply to: daveparkrealtor@gmail.com
Date: 2009-03-07, 7:32AM PST


Don't miss this fabulous 4bedroom 2bath turn of the century brown shingle home on a large deep lot in Alameda's exclusive Gold Coast neighborhood.

For more information visit www.1611SanAntonio.com
The listing history is sad (what little you can get from the MLS(r) anyway):

Property History for 1611 SAN ANTONIO Ave

Date Event Price
Jan 01, 2009 Listed $1,059,000
Jan 01, 2009 Off Redfin *
Sep 18, 2008 Listed *
Sep 18, 2008 Off Redfin *
Sep 13, 2008 Price Changed *
Sep 08, 2008 Relisted *
Jul 12, 2008 Relisted *
Jul 10, 2008 Off Redfin *
Jun 21, 2008 Price Changed *
Jun 03, 2008 Relisted *
May 27, 2008 Off Redfin *
Apr 30, 2008 Listed *

If I remember correctly, one of the price changes last year was from $1,095,000 to $1,059,000. The Google search results aren't conclusive, but I do remember thinking the price drop was silly:

1611-san-antonio-previous-price-maybe.jpgI couldn't find a sale history for this property, so there should be room to drop significantly. Zillow's mostly useless Zestimates, which are usually much too high, have this house valued at $725,000 as of today, which is about right for...

4 beds, 2.0 baths, 2,148 sq ft, MLS(r) #40387468
I've only seen the outside, but trusted acquaintances tell me the house isn't in good enough condition to warrant a seven-digit price; supposedly lots of little annoyances and signs of age all over. I might just drop by an open house to confirm.

The Spite House's neighbor at 1343 Broadway (MLS(r) #40397569 and #40397471) came on the market this week, and I'll post on it when I have a chance to research it a little more. Also watch for a post on strategically-priced, sub-$1M 735 Palmera Court (MLS(r) #40398286), which is listed for considerably less than a neighbor a little while back, and a pointy, overpriced East-Ender at 1616 Cornell Drive (MLS(r) #40398284).

Update 4/27/09: Finally a price drop, to $938,000. Relisted as MLS(r) #40406999.

Update 9/28/09: Sold for $900,000.
Today's new listing is a pretty Victorian on the lagoon on the 1900 block of Clinton. Handy if you need to run to the hospital. The specs:

4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2,563 sqft, 7,420-sqft lot, triplex, MLS(r) #40389387, $949,000

Gorgeous "turn of the century" victorian on lagoon on gold coast [...] Owners unit is 2 bedr/1 bath w/formal dr, sunporch,etc. All units have access to backyard, deck and lagoon. Updated triplex with original charm. [...] One of a kind! Must see

1904-clinton-street-view.jpg
It's certainly pretty, although I'm not sure I like the siding. It's also across the street from a large, formerly gorgeous white Victorian on a corner lot that's falling to bits slowly but surely:

1901-clinton-probably-street-view.jpg
I haven't seen the inside, so I can't vouch for its condition, but the outside is nice, it has direct lagoon access and a big lot, and it's fairly large, so $949,000 ($370 / sqft) is probably enough to make it move quickly. I don't know if they're going to get it, though, since the house sold for "only" $700,000 in late 2007, near the peak of the market, at a time when house prices were actually higher than they are now; this suggests there might be something funny going on with the property. But again, I haven't seen it (or the disclosures), so it's hard to tell.

Whatever the case may be, though, I suspect the owners realized you can't make a $700,000 triplex cash-flow-positive no matter how you slice it, especially if you've added the mortgage by upgrading a bunch of things (emphasis added):

Home Description

Triplex with 2 1 Bedroom units on the 1st floor and a 2 Bedroom on the upper floor. Located directly on the lagoon with its own pier and deck on the water. Great Views. New roof & double-pane windows, oak floors refinished, upgraded electrical, freshly repainted, insulated.

Provided by the owner
The owners also appear to have set a "Make me move" price on Zillow (a cool million, natch), and put it up as a FSBO on Zillow as well, which suggests they may have wanted to bail very shortly after they bought the house.

1904-clinton-fsbo.jpgAt any rate, their expectations have dropped a hair, as evidenced by their sub-$1M list price. It'll be interesting to see what happens.

Calling all fine neighborhoodlums, today's good-sized Colonial on a miniature lot has a lot to recommend it: location, location, location, size, the whole neighborhood's extraordinary curb appeal, and an interesting pricing strategy.

2 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 1,389 sqft, 1,980-sqft lot, MLS(r) #40376605, $588,000
Alameda's Gold Coast calls those who want a fine neighborhood AND a classic Colonial Revival. [...] small lot has an afternoon sun-drenched garden. Nice sized rooms on both levels [...] surrounded by many of Alameda's large stunning properties.

928-san-antonio-street-view.jpgFrom the outside, it's pretty and certainly holds its own against its neighbors; at least as much as the big Craftsman right next door to the Zeus temple building a couple of blocks away, if it weren't for the tiny lot and possible garagelessness. But what's of interest is that the asking price is almost reasonable given the area ($423 / sqft), and is strategically below $600,000, which seems to be the sweet spot for "starter homes" in Alameda--except it's a lot larger and/or in an arguably better neighborhood than most of its sub-$600K brethren. Another notable tidbit is that $600,000 is precisely what the owner paid four years ago, almost to the day:

Last sale and tax info

Sold 10/19/2004: $600,000
2007 Property Tax: $7,644
The list price is also less than the current Zestimate of $615,000, the much-maligned inaccuracy of which some agents are very willing to ignore when it serves their interest.

Unless there's something truly wretched about this property, I expect it won't last terribly long.

Update 2/22/09: Thanks to readers bespoke and Alameda Realtor, who pointed out this property is back on the market as MLS(r) #40396374, at a lower price ($565,000).

Update 3/21/09: Dropped to $549,000. Death by a thousand price cuts. Maybe next time the owner will buy a property with a garage (or at least a driveway) and more than 24 inches separating it from its neighbor.
One of four listings to hit the market all at once this week, 1724 Alameda Avenue is also the most interesting. I wasn't able to find any public domain pictures, so I'll probably shoot a couple this weekend and post. First, the specs:

4 bedrooms, 1 bathroom, 2 stories, unfinished basement, 2,652 sqft, 13,200-sqft lot, MLS(r) #40373116, $899,999

Sonoma in Alameda? [...] 4 bedroom Italianate style home [...] huge double lot with gardens, it also includes a spa like studio cottage. Main house needs cosmetics.[...]
You read right. 13,200-sqft lot, in a great location, where they truly aren't making any more land. Built in 1889, it's also been owned by the same folks for a long time, judging by the low property tax ($1,774) and absence of sale history on its Zillow page.

I took a look at this property; the lot is so big you can't really take good pictures of the building without trespassing, which I wasn't interested in doing, so here's what you can see from the street:

1724_alameda_avenue_mine.jpg $339 / sqft for a big, beautiful house with bonus cottage on a giant lot in the Gold Coast means it's not going to last.

Update 10/11/08: As expected, it's already off the MLS.

Update 12/05/08: Sold for $870,000. Smart sellers.
I always get very excited when a Victorian or a Gold Coast house comes on the market. The way I see it, there isn't much point in owning your own home in Alameda unless it's a Victorian (or a really nice Craftsman). So when I saw this new one show up today I thought "Yay! a Gold Coast Victorian!". 1833 San Antonio Avenue, Alameda has the following mouth-watering specs, in addition to a great address and a respectable MLS(r) #40367794:

3 bedrooms, 1 1/2 bathrooms, 2,192 sqft, 4,320-sqft lot (per public records)
4 bedrooms, 2 1/2 bathrooms (per other places I was chastised for mentioning)

Beautiful, spacious home [...] Gold Coast. Granite, stone, marble, custom paint and moldings [...] Pocket doors, formal dining room [...] a home you have to visit the inside to really appreciate. [...]
Then I saw the street view photo. They're not kidding about the "home you have to visit the inside to really appreciate," wonky grammar notwithstanding. What happened to all the siding?

1833-san-antonio-zillow.jpgThen I saw the price: $1,175,000, or $536 / sqft, which is way too high.

Then I saw the sale history and did some math.

Last sale and tax info

Sold 03/19/2004: $660,000
2007 Property Tax: $8,48

$660,000 to $1,175,000 in 4 1/2 years represents a rate of appreciation of about 17% y-o-y, every year, since it was last purchased. I realize the owners may have done significant improvements to the place, but nearly doubling the price of a home? Give me a break. If it was such a wreck they did bring it back to life, why on earth did they pay $660,000 for it in the first place?

Update a few hours later: I drove by and confirmed the street view photo. There's no siding on the front of the house, even though there is some on the east side of the house. The bulgy tower seems out of place, even though towers are common in houses from that period; it just looks funny all naked like that without any wood siding, especially compared to two dozen Vics on the same block in full wood siding attire. And if you chance on the photos that just appeared on various MLS(r) sites, which EBRD objects to my posting here, you'll see the inside has essentially zero Victorian character (but a lot of Terminator-clad kitchen toys).

Update 10/26/08
: Price dropped to $1,095,000 on 10/22.

Update 2/3/09: It's back.




Announcement: read about EBRD, Inc.'s DMCA content removal complaint against this blog


This property threatened to come on the market back in March via semi-cryptic craigslist posts. It's finally made it onto craigslist again, with few details. The address isn't given, but my sources tell me it is located at 1025 San Antonio. The listing is still a little coy (see bold passages below; my emphasis):

$799000 "Gold Coast" Craftsman on the Island of Alameda! (alameda) (map)


Reply to: nick.falconio@prurealty.com [?]
Date: 2008-09-02, 9:53PM PDT

This is a rare opportunity to purchase a beautiful Craftman home in one of the most desirable areas in the East Bay - before it is offered to the general public! This home is on a beautiful tree-lined street and is comprised of four bedrooms, two baths, refinished hardwood floors, original paneling and wainscoating, tiled fireplace, built in buffet and may other original details. There is an attached one car garage w/bonus room above! Outside is a delightful rear garden area with potting shed and patio. If you're looking to own a home on Alameda's Gold Coast, don't miss this opportunity!

I am offering this home first to buyers who ARE NOT being represented by a real estate agent, and who are pre-approved by a lender. Please contact me directly for a private showing before I offer the home to the general public. I can be reached at (510)986-2008

Nick Flaconio,Realtor
Prudential California Realty
nick.falconio@prurealty.com
Aside from spelling his own last name two different ways, Nick is very cagey about this house and not telling you where exactly it is. I think it's the brown Craftsman next to the Greek revival compound extraordinaire (drool) below:

1025-san-antonio-street-view.jpgThere's no sale history on Zillow, so one assumes the house has been in the same family for a long time and might even be owned outright. You can't beat the location, and (assuming I have the right house) the following specs make it competitive, at $339 / sqft:

3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2,359 sqft, 6,250-sqft lot
Other than perpetual house envy when you look at the 8-bedroom, 4,500-sqft Parthenon extravaganza next door, in this market this house seems like a reasonable deal in the best location in town, especially given its large lot. Of course, $799,000 for almost any house under 3,500 sqft is obscene--note that I said "in this market"...

1025_san_antonio_mine.jpg
Update 9/23/08: Finally listed on the MLS(r) as #40371147, for $825,000, which interestingly is exactly one agent's commission above the previous "no agents need apply" listing. I guess selling a ~$800K house to someone with the requirement they not be represented isn't as easy as it sounds.

Update 11/28/08: I thought it had sold, but the official Prudential page still has it as active after 66 days on the market.

Update 12/05/08: Sold for $809,000. Good luck to the neighbors.

Announcement: read about EBRD, Inc.'s DMCA content removal complaint against this blog


This property (most likely 1626 Alameda Avenue, based on my recollection and public records) keeps coming on the market and disappearing. The phone number is always a Santa Barbara area code (805), and the description is USUALLY IN ALL CAPS. I have talked to at least one agent who's told me this has been happening for years without a sale.

The specs courtesy of Trulia:

4 br  5 ba  4,416 sqft  
Multi-Family Home

Year Built: 1908 

From:

Listing Type:

Status:  

Price/sqft: $

Lot Size:

Days on Market:

Neighborhood:

A picture courtesy of yours truly:

1628_alameda_avenue_mine.jpgHere's the craigslist post that appeared today:

$1145000 TURN OF THE CENTURY MANSION ALAMEDA GOLD COAST (alameda) (map)


Reply to: hous-815953936@craigslist.org [?]
Date: 2008-08-27, 5:43PM PDT


THIS SPACIOUS (4416 SQ. FT.) TURN OF THE CENTURY PROPERTY OFFERS LOADS OF LOVELY SPACE FOR EXTENDED OR SINGLE FAMILY LIVING PLUS THERE IS LEGAL RENTAL POTENTIAL. IT HAS SIX BEDROOMS, SIX BATHS, COVED CEILINGS, HARDWOOD FLOORS, POCKET DOORS AND DECORATIVE FIREPLACES. HUGE UPDATED KITCHEN WITH ALL MODERN APPLIANCES. THERE IS A FINISHED LIVING ATTIC CONVERSION DONE WITH PERMITS AND A FINISHED BASEMENT DONE WITH PERMITS AND USED AS A DEN PLAYROOM OR OFFICE. THE HOUSE HAS BEEN EARTHQUAKE RETROFITTED AND IS NOT ON BRICK FOUNDATIONS. A LOVELY BRICK PATIO COURTYARD GARDEN IS AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE AND HAS A CHARMING WISTERIA COVERED GAZEBO WHICH IS GREAT FOR OUTDOOR ENTERTAINING. THERE ARE TWO SINGLE CAR GARAGES AND OFF STREET PARKING FOR ANOTHER TWO VEHICLES. EASY WALK TO BUS LINES CONNECTING TO BART AND FERRY AND DIRECT SERVICE TO DOWNTOWN SAN FRANCISCO. YOU ARE IN THE FINEST FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT AND JUST AROUND THE CORNER FROM FRANKLIN PARK. A HOUSE ON THE PARK HAS CURRENTLY SOLD FOR 1,289,000 SO PRICES HAVEN'T DROPPED MUCH IN ALAMEDA!!! WHY FIGHT THE COST AND AGGRAVATION OF COMMUTING WHEN YOU CAN LIVE THE GOOD LIFE IN ALAMEDA'S LOVELY GOLD COAST DISTRICT CALL 805 927 1058 FOR MORE INFORMATION AND AN APPOINTMENT TO VIEW




ALAMEDA AVE. at GRAND ST.
The house is a huge rambling mess. It seems to have started out as a duplex and morphed into a boarding house over the years, with multiple rooms rented to separate tenants. The basement "unit" is only of legal height if you're a garden gnome. There are bathrooms everywhere, of questionable legality, including one right off the main level kitchen, from which it is separated by only a louvered folding door. Better be comfortable showering while someone's making breakfast. That main level kitchen has two sinks, for whatever reason, and a hodgepodge of tiled counters jutting out from the middle of the room in weird configurations. There doesn't seem to be a single level floor anywhere in the house. Ugly, old, dirty carpet covers about half of the floors, including the bathrooms. In the upstairs unit, a water heater hides in a closet whose door was sawed off at the bottom--in the dining room, right by the fireplace. There's a semi-random sun porch on the upstairs floor that also serves as a landing for the outside stairs running the entire height of the house, from the ground level to the attic apartment (which also appears to be non-permitted). There is no front yard, and the back "yard" is a minuscule plot of pavers with a lot of trellis work holding up some vegetation. There's hardly enough room for a picnic table and a barbecue grill. The house's only redeeming qualities are its location and concrete foundation.

Does anybody know what's going on with this property?

Zillow shows 2 "anomalous" (non-arms-length, probably) transactions in the 1990s:


Sale History
05/20/1999: $184,000 *
05/13/1996: $152,000 *
No other sale data is available
* Transaction not included in Zestimate.


Update 10/9/08:
I don't know what's going on this week, but it's been a particularly absurd few days. This property is now listed with an agent (Carol Burnett), an MLS number (#40374667), and a VERY LOUD DESCRIPTION IN ALL CAPS:

GOLD COAST COLONIAL REVIVAL DUPLEX OR FAMILY HOME WITH ART STUDIO ATTIC [...] BASEMENT. HISTORICAL ELEGANCE NESTLED IN THE SERENITY OF ALAMEDA'S EXCLUSIVE NEIGHBORHOOD, BOTH LUXURY AND SPACIOUSNESS [...] ORIGINAL DETAILS,TRANQUIL BACK YARD.

Update 12/31/08:
Cute typo brings price up to over 1 billion dollars ($1,145,000,000). Maybe TARP can help?

START YOUR NEW YEAR RIGHT BY BUYING THIS VERSATILE PIECE OF PROPERTY. THIS HOUSE IS GREAT FOR LARGE OR EXTENDED FAMILIES OR LEGAL RENTAL UNIT. SIX BEDROOMS, SIX BATHS TWO LARGE PARLOURS AND TWO BEAUTIFUL DINING ROOMS WITH MANY ORIGINAL FEATURES INCLUDING HARDWOOD FLOORS, COVED CEILINGS, POCKET DOORS AND BAY WINDOWS GIVE THIS HOME THE AMBIENCE YOU WANT FOR ENTERTAINING. LOVELY BRICKED IN COURTYARD GARDEN WITH WISTERIA COVERED GAZEBO COMPLETES THE PICTURE FOR EASY LIVING. THERE IS A FINISHED BASEMENT (DONE WITH PERMITS) AND TWO SINGLE CAR GARAGES WITH OFF STREET PARKING FOR ANOTHER TWO VECHICLES. EASY WALK TO PUBLIC TRANSPORT CONNECTING TO ANYWHERE IN THE BAY AREA. BEST PART, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE EXCLUSIVE FRANKLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT EXCELLENT SCHOOLS WITH NO FEES. CALL 805 927 1058 FOR APPOINTMENT TO VIEW

Update 3/7/09:
Back on the market at the same price, same all-caps listing, new agent. MLS(r) #40398582.

Update 3/23/09:
Miraculously, the price dropped to $1,095,000. We have two MLS(r) numbers: 40374667 and 40398582.

Update 9/28/09:
Death by a thousand price drops. I'm particularly impressed by the last two--$5,000 and $2,000 all at once! So far the price is down $202,000 (18%) from the initial list price.

Price Reduced: 03/24/09 -- $1,145,000 to $1,095,000
Price Reduced: 05/12/09 -- $1,095,000 to $1,049,000
Price Reduced: 06/23/09 -- $1,049,000 to $999,000
Price Reduced: 07/23/09 -- $999,000 to $950,000
Price Reduced: 08/25/09 -- $950,000 to $945,000
Price Reduced: 09/21/09 -- $945,000 to $943,000


Announcement:
read about EBRD, Inc.'s DMCA content removal complaint against this blog

A house on Palmera Court was for sale for ages a couple of years ago, and I don't know if it ever sold. But today, a new Palmera Court mansionette appeared on the market (MLS #40337069) for a price that might actually get it sold, $1.15M:

Mediterranean Elegance - Gold Coast Spanish Colonial Revival, by noted architect Andrew T. Hass as his residence. Serene setting replete w/vintage houses & period streetlights. Spacious rooms w/natural light, hrdwd flrs, ornate corner fireplace, country kitchen, FM & yard w/patio garden & fountain.
(no photo yet) (boring)

1711-palmera-court-alameda.jpg
The specs are appealing, except the lot is a bit small:

List Price: $1,150,000
ZipRealty will give you up to $6,900 cash back.*

Bedrooms: 3
Full Baths: 2
Partial Baths: 1
Square Feet: 2,482
Lot Size: 4,620 Sq. Ft.
Year Built: 1924
Listing Date: 04/17/08
On Market: 0 day
Type: SFR
Status: ACTIVE
MLS #: 40337069


Off the top of my head I don't remember a single time in the past 3 years when so many high-end Gold Coast homes were for sale at the same time. We have three homes on St Charles, Mr Big on Hawthorne, this home, 1600 Dayton (MLS #40315927) as well as the more ordinary (and I suppose less-Gold-Coasty) 909 San Antonio, 2049 San Antonio and a bunch of others.

There is no sale history for this house, so I suspect it might have been owned by the same person for ages with a ton of equity (perhaps 100%), hence the realistic price. Good job pricing nice homes right. Let's see how it goes (and please post some pictures soon!)

This big Craftsman (MLS #40336984) just came on the market today at $1.33M:

Simply beautiful gold coast craftsman--four bedrooms, three and a half baths, living room, dining room, library, eat-in kitchen, family room area, private yard with lawn and "sport court." newer foundation, roof, stove, fridge, heating system, new water heater. 7500 sq. Ft. Lot. Large basement!

IMGP0363_1250_st_charles.JPGThe specs: 4 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2,687 sqft, 7,500-sqft lot, $1,330,000

Who knew there'd be so much turnover on that block (all on the same side!). Especially this soon:

Last sale and tax info

Sold 06/16/2006: $1,285,000
2007 Property Tax: $13,416
$50K premium over asking price 2 years ago = no money for you, Mr Seller.

Update 4/30/08: Drove by tonight and saw a "SALE PENDING" sign outside. That was FAST!

Update 10/4/08: Sold for $1,350,000 on May 15th.
This large Gold Coast home came on the market about 3 months ago (MLS #40317490), on January 10:

Large home in Gold Coast;3 car garage;fabulous entryway, graceful stairway, large LR, & formal DR. Period details, redwood wainscoting, open floor plan; ideal for entertaining. Newly refinished hardwood floors on 1st & 2nd stories. 2 bonus rooms on 3rd floor and a partial basement.

1260_st_charles_mine.jpgIts price dropped from $1,398,000 to $1,298,000 in early March, 2008.

If I remember correctly, this house was repossessed by the lender. That transaction shows a price of $1,495,000, which may be the default amount on the loan. Interestingly, the home was bought for quite a bit less than that, so one suspects a HELOC gone wild:

Sale History
11/19/2007: $1,495,000 *
10/16/2001: $1,195,000 *
No other sale data is available

The amount of fake money generated, exchanged and subsequently lost over the past few years just in the real estate market is staggering.

In the process of writing about another large Gold Coast property, I did some digging on 1234 Hawthorne Street, a beautiful, enormous 8,020-sqft mansion that's been on and off the market for a little while (MLS #40321930).

1234_hawthorne_mine.jpg
This house was on the market in 2007 for $2,250,000 with listing id 40251111 (which may or may not be the MLS id):

1234-hawthorne-old-price.jpgIt actually started at $2,400,000, but the only trace I found was in Google's cache of a postlet listed on Propsmart:

1234-hawthorne-original-price.jpg
It's now (April 2008) down to $1,900,000 and not really moving all that much as far as I can tell.

What's troubling is the murky legal wrangle that may or may not be associated with the current owners. Please note: This is NOT VERIFIED INFORMATION, ONLY A LIST OF DATA PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ON PUBLIC WEB SITES. THE AUTHOR OF THIS POST IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR FACTUAL ERRORS AND WILL POST ANY AND ALL CREDIBLE CORRECTIONS PROVIDED TO HER IN A TIMELY MANNER.

Now that's out of the way, let's see what we find.

First, Googling "1234 Hawthorne" brings up a donation to the democratic national committee by one "Jack Easterbay" on the Huffington Post:

easterbay.jpgGoogling "Jack Easterbay" brings up a helpful correction by Google:

easterbay_google.jpgWhy, I suppose I did. So what do we get?

easterday_google.jpgAgain, I have no proof that the 'Jack Easterday, owner of Homewood Care Center [...] of Alameda [...]  vilified as living "like Louis XIV"' is the same as "Jack Easterbay" listed on the Huffington post as living at 1234 Hawthorne. Maybe there's a completely honest Democrat named Jack Easterbay who works in health care at Westland Med and lives in a huge mansion in Alameda, and a Jack Easterday who was convicted of fraud in relation to healthcare and lives "like Louis XIV" in Alameda. But the convict's story isn't pretty:

[source] Jack Easterday of Alameda, who had been vilified as living "like Louis XIV" during a U.S. Senate hearing last year on tax cheats, could face up to five years in federal prison. He was convicted Wednesday by a federal jury.

The conviction was announced the same day state health officials fined Homewood Care Center, a San Jose nursing home, $100,000 — the highest fine allowed under state law — for substandard care that led to the October death of a 67-year-old man. Easterday,52, is president of Homewood Care Center's parent company, Westline Medical Management.

The conviction, coupled with the fine for the resident's death, raised concerns about the future of Easterday's eight nursing homes in California, which include Oakland Care Center on Webster Street in Oakland, Alameda Care Center on Willow Street in Alameda and Eden West Convalescent Hospital on West Street in Hayward.
or

[source] On July 13, 2007, in San Francisco, CA, Jack Easterday was sentenced to 30 months in prison and ordered to pay $8,710,795 in restitution and a special assessment of $10,700 for his willful failure to pay employment taxes owed to the government.  On March 7, 2007, Easterday was convicted by a federal jury on 107 counts of failing to pay $9.6 million in payroll taxes.  [...] Coleman said Easterday used the payroll taxes he collected "for personal gain." "He paid himself and his wife an average annual salary of more than $338,000 between 1998 and 2004," Coleman said. "He purchased a 10,000-square-foot home for $750,000 in 1997. He purchased a dining table and chairs that seated 22 people along with a 24-place setting of Limoges china. He purchased a Rolex watch for $16,340. He owned a sailboat and jet skis. He was living like Louis XIV, compliments of the American taxpayer."
or

[source] On February 9, 2006, Jack Easterday of Alameda, California, was found guilty in federal court in Oakland, of 47 counts of failing to account for and pay payroll taxes. Easterday was the owner of several San Francisco Bay area nursing homes. He was convicted of failing to pay more than $3 million in employee taxes to the IRS which he withheld from employee checks from 1998 to 2002 while serving as president of Employee Equity Administration Inc. of Alameda. The company operated nine California nursing homes, and software firm Skilled Logic Systems Inc. Easterday allegedly thwarted IRS efforts to collect the taxes by claiming to have no assests while paying himself and his wife exorbitant salaries and directors' fees.

(there's more and more; evidently there's a Jack Easterday in Alameda that's a kick-ass tennis player as well.)

People named Jack Easterday in Alameda do seem to have a fondness for health care and bad luck with the tax authorities: minutes from a 2002 city council meeting (pdf) show this interesting tidbit:

Jack Easterday, Alameda, stated a rental tax for Alameda Care Center shows up on the delinquent Property Tax Bill; however, said matter was settled 12-14 years ago

Note that the only transaction for 1234 Hawthorne I found on Zillow is a sale for $595,000 in 1986, and the house is (only!) 8,020 square feet, so that's probably not the "10,000-square-foot home [purchased] for $750,000 in 1997" mentioned in the second excerpt, even allowing for poetic license. But the old listing sure did show a big ol' dining table:

1234-hawthorne-dining-table.jpg
I'll be looking at the listing with increased interest now. Comments and corrections welcome.

Update: I decided to be cheeky and talk to the real estate agent representing the property, John Selbach. John is a very pleasant man and he had the following facts to share (paraphrased from notes taken during a phone conversation):

There are IRS liens on the property
The IRS hasn't taken it because it can't take a person's primary residence
The sellers want to sell and move out of town
The agent expects one or two offers next week
The seller smart business man who wants to sell
The kitchen is old (1980s) and big, so it'll be an expensive remodel; the owners didn't use it much and worked late, ate out or ordered Chinese take-out
The home has a brick foundation, but the pest and home inspectors agree 100% the foundation is as good as new,
and is the best brick foundation you'll ever see in your life
The pest report is about $15,000
Because of the lien, the IRS isn't going to let the seller give it away
But why is it every time I talk to an agent about a slow-moving and/or overpriced listing, they're always expecting one or two offers the next week? I got the same line from the agent for 1420 Fountain Street, where the sellers were holding ONE showing during the week and were expecting to review offers a few days later. 78 days later the house hasn't budged (and neither has its price).

Update 4/21/2008: This property appears to be pending, and is off the MLS as far as I can tell.

Update 5/12/2008: The property is back on the market, at $1.9M

Update 10/4/2008: Here's a of picture of the front door I took a little while back.

1234_hawthorne_door_mine.jpg

An enormous Craftsman on the Gold Coast recently appeared (5+4, 4,400 sqft, double lot, very close to the lagoon, MLS #40335717), asking a mere $2,395,000:

Immaculate Gold Coast home on huge lot. [...] bocce ball court & pool. Renovated throughout. Large gourmet kitchen [...] formal dining room. Huge living room with library and wet bar. 3 fireplaces! [...]

1208_st_charles_mine.jpgThere is no question the house looks magnificent, and the address is as good as it gets in Alameda. That being said, it's not obvious where the market is for these white elephants (this is now the second most expensive residential building on the market in all of Alameda after this huge house with a view, and the most expensive on the main island), considering recent activity in the top tier:

  1. A giant Victorian compound at 1723-1725 Central Avenue took months to sell for $2.025M in late January, 2008, barely $50K more than the previous purchase price after 6% commission; it was listed at $2.2M in summer 2007
  2. 1234 Hawthorne Street (MLS #40321930), possibly the largest single-family home in town (it is twice as big as this property and just a block or two away), was listed at $2,250,000 last year, went off the market over the holidays, came back in January at $1,900,000, and is still sitting there (see some interesting dirt on 1234 Hawthorne)
  3. 1200 San Antonio Avenue was on the market for ages for $2,595,000 if memory serves, and it didn't sell

1200_san_antonio_mine.JPG

  1. There's another 4,000-sqft elephant right down the street at 1260 Saint Charles that happens to be bank-owned and not selling, even though it's priced at just a hair over half this home's asking price (MLS #40317490, $1,298,000)
  2. A "custom" estate still owned by its original owner (who must be pushing 100 by now) at 1600 Dayton Avenue started out over $2.2M in 2007 and is still languishing at $1.995M (MLS #40315927)

We'll have to see what happens.

Update 5/13/08: What happens is a price $200,000 drop from $2,395,000 to $2,195,000 on May 9th.

Update 8/29/08: Apparently sold for $2,050,000 on 7/31/08. What is a bit weird is that four $2M+ homes on Saint Charles, almost right next to each other, were reportedly sold (closed, at least) on 7/31/08 for the exact same price of $2,050,000:

1206 St. Charles Street
$2,050,000, sold 07-31-08

1208 St. Charles Street
$2,050,000, sold 07-31-08, 4059 sq. ft., 1910

1212 St. Charles Street
$2,050,000, sold 07-31-08

1214 St. Charles Street
$2,050,000, sold 07-31-08, 234 sq. ft., 1937
I'm guessing this property just sprawled over 4 addresses. Zillow has no record of 1206 or 1212, and 1214 St. Charles looks like a 0-bedroom, 1 1/2-bathroom, 234-sqft garden shed.

There is no sale history on Zillow, but the Berkeley Daily Planet shows a previous price of $1,374,545 in 2002.

$2,050,000 1214 St. Charles St   234 1937 $1,374,545 2002 7/31/08 94501
$2,050,000 1212 St. Charles St           7/31/08 94501
$2,050,000 1206 St. Charles St           7/31/08 94501
$2,050,000 1208 St. Charles St   4059 1910 $1,374,545 2002 7/31/08 94501

Trulia has a similar history:

Public records for 1214 Saint Charles St

Sales History
Historical home sale price (1): $1,300,000
Prior sale date: May 25, 2004
Change since this sale (1):
NA
 
Historical home sale price (2): $1,374,545
Prior sale date: Aug 29, 2002
Change since this sale (2): -5%



I was excited earlier this week because a big Victorian (a Marcuse and Remmel, no less) came on the market at $993,000. I've been pining for cool Vics, and this looked like just the ticket, which a drive-by confirmed. Nice specs and pretty pictures:

LIGHT & BRIGHT! TERRIFIC Marcuse & Remmel Queen Anne Duplex in the edge of the Gold Coast. UPPER: 3/2 w/Family Rm, laundry & attic storage. LOWER: Large 2/1 single-level w/Laundry. Both have large kitchens. Existing door between units = 5/3 single home w/lots of plus space. Garage w/workshop space.

Much to my surprise, it showed up on Craigslist today, just 4 or 5 days after it was first listed, with a $60,000 haircut. Yay! That's $12,000 to $15,000 a day. I suppose it could be a typo, but the Craigslist header does match the postlets price, so I have to assume either it's legit or it's been languishing in the MLS with the wrong price for a week. Whee.

1021_fair_oaks_price_drop.jpg

Update: only one or two rooms have hardwood floors (reclaimed from a demolished school); everything else is carpeted (agh). The Marcuse and Remmel pressed wood trim is covered in so much paint you can barely distinguish the relief. Both units are in excellent shape, but they look and feel like a condo, rather than a stately old home. Blech.


Update 5/15/08: Sold for $970,000.

Tags