Repeat offenders: September 2009 Archives
Tis the season to be relisted. 2017 Lincoln Avenue disappeared a few months ago, but came roaring back this week, with new MLS(r) #40431603 and a slightly reduced price ($549,900, down from $560,000).
The description is cute:
As is the house (it's the little blue one, not the pretty yellow one):
As for the location, it's cute mostly if you enjoy a high-traffic thoroughfare and a schoolyard across the street.
It appears this property took a detour through the bank before coming back on the market this time around:
Anyone care to speculate where the $150K increase between the initial loan in 2004 and the (ostensibly) repo price in July 2009 came from?
The description is cute:
[...] hardwood floors, Just needs a new owner to place the final touchs on this gem.
As is the house (it's the little blue one, not the pretty yellow one):
As for the location, it's cute mostly if you enjoy a high-traffic thoroughfare and a schoolyard across the street.
It appears this property took a detour through the bank before coming back on the market this time around:Property History for 2017 LINCOLN Ave
| Date | Event | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2009 | Listed | $549,900 |
| Jul 10, 2009 | Sold | $658,445 |
| Oct 29, 2004 | Sold | $509,000 |
Anyone care to speculate where the $150K increase between the initial loan in 2004 and the (ostensibly) repo price in July 2009 came from?
Various folks are predicting a spike in inventory in the last quarter of this year, and while I have no evidence today's property at 2512 Calhoun St is a distress sale, the sale history certainly doesn't suggest a happy transaction. Not to mention the fact it tried to sell itself last year to no avail. First the specs for the current listing:
This property is now listed for $679,000 ($408 / sqft), which is too high and has no chance in hell of ever making sense as an investment property the way rents are going. It's a tad less than it was last December ($699,000 then), but still nowhere near where it needs to be. But it certainly makes more sense than the price the owners paid just three years ago:
Welcome back, little duplex. Maybe this fall season will be kinder to you than last year's.
Duplex, 5 bedrooms (3+2), 3 bathrooms, 1,665 sqft, MLS(r) #40430973, $679,000
[...] ideal for owner-occupancy with a great rental unit downstairs! Gleaming hardwood floors, granite counters, fresh paint inside & out. [...] On Demand water heater for efficiency! Brand new landscaping with sprinkler system. Feels like home, must see to appreciate!
This property is now listed for $679,000 ($408 / sqft), which is too high and has no chance in hell of ever making sense as an investment property the way rents are going. It's a tad less than it was last December ($699,000 then), but still nowhere near where it needs to be. But it certainly makes more sense than the price the owners paid just three years ago:Property History for 2512 CALHOUN St
| Date | Event | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2009 | Listed | $679,000 |
| Dec 02, 2008 | Delisted | * |
| Jun 30, 2008 | Listed | * |
| Oct 17, 2006 | Sold | $770,000 |
Welcome back, little duplex. Maybe this fall season will be kinder to you than last year's.
Speaking of recent relists, 3042 Thompson Avenue is back as MLS(r) #40429335 and with a $26,000 (3.6%) price cut to $699,000. Please refer to the original post for details.
The pointy-hat Victorian at 1009 Central is back as MLS(r) #40429761 with a new, slightly lower price of $460,750, down from $499,000 last March. Please refer to the original post for details.

Here's a summary of the listing activity since 2005:

Here's a summary of the listing activity since 2005:
Property History for 1009 CENTRAL Ave
| Date | Event | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2009 | Listed | $460,750 |
| Jul 31, 2009 | Sold | $432,000 |
| Jun 04, 2009 | Delisted | * |
| May 27, 2009 | Relisted | * |
| Apr 01, 2009 | Delisted | * |
| Mar 21, 2009 | Listed | * |
| Aug 04, 2005 | Sold | $700,000 |
Remember how, three or four years ago, housing bears were being mocked for missing out on the opportunity of a lifetime to get into the market and buy a house before everybody got priced out forever?
Well, those chickens are coming home in droves, with yet another Bayport McMansion coming back to the market just three years after it was purchased--again. You can read the specs on the original post.
Today's updated listing on Craigslist describes the house like this:

It's now listed for $675,000 (still with the old MLS(r) #40390663, which isn't active as far as I can tell), down from $695,000 back in January, down from $830,500 when it closed escrow almost exactly three years ago.
Well, those chickens are coming home in droves, with yet another Bayport McMansion coming back to the market just three years after it was purchased--again. You can read the specs on the original post.
Today's updated listing on Craigslist describes the house like this:
Beautiful Classic Colonial in prestigious Bayport Development of Alameda Ca. This home comes with a multitude of upgrades. Custom tile in entryway, French Doors that open up to a private office or Formal Dining room. Designer lights over Kithen breakfast counter. Fireplace in Family room with additional lighting. Finshed side and back patio with custom pavers. Beautifully landscaped yard with automatic sprinklers. Custom paint. Master Bedroom suite with private patio. Lots of Upgrades. Great Value! This is a Short Sale that has been lender approved for the price. BPO's have already been done. Can close escrow in less than 30 days!!

It's now listed for $675,000 (still with the old MLS(r) #40390663, which isn't active as far as I can tell), down from $695,000 back in January, down from $830,500 when it closed escrow almost exactly three years ago.
This is getting ridiculous.
A Victorian semi-wreck in a hideous location (if you're a single-family home), cozily nestled betwixt a laundromat and a tailor, standing directly across busy lower Park street from a party store and a stone's throw away from my favorite tire shop (perfect for those mid-afternoon nitrogen cravings), came back on the market for the third time in 18 months, and once again it is listed for more money that the last time around.
More money. Not less. And from walking past this property at least once a week, I can tell you its exterior looks haven't exactly improved with the passage of time. Here's what it looked like to Google's Street View van a little while ago:

Here's a handy summary; please refer to the previous post for details on the property.
It didn't sell then, for obvious reasons, and now it's back, with timing so perfect it seems to have been carefully chosen to completely miss the peak of the selling season. And it's listed for $1,400 more than last year.
The sale and listing history are amusing; I suspect the June, 2008 transaction is the bank taking it back:
A Victorian semi-wreck in a hideous location (if you're a single-family home), cozily nestled betwixt a laundromat and a tailor, standing directly across busy lower Park street from a party store and a stone's throw away from my favorite tire shop (perfect for those mid-afternoon nitrogen cravings), came back on the market for the third time in 18 months, and once again it is listed for more money that the last time around.
More money. Not less. And from walking past this property at least once a week, I can tell you its exterior looks haven't exactly improved with the passage of time. Here's what it looked like to Google's Street View van a little while ago:

Here's a handy summary; please refer to the previous post for details on the property.
- In May, 2008, 1192 Park Street hit the MLS(r) as #40340126, listed at a grotesque $925,000. It had been on Zillow prior to that for $898,000 or so, if memory serves, and failed to sell, so the seller raised the price in a bid to attract more potential buyers.
- Then, in October, 2008, the property came back, presumably bank-owned by then, listed at $708,500.
It didn't sell then, for obvious reasons, and now it's back, with timing so perfect it seems to have been carefully chosen to completely miss the peak of the selling season. And it's listed for $1,400 more than last year.
The sale and listing history are amusing; I suspect the June, 2008 transaction is the bank taking it back:
Property History for 1192 PARK St
Date |
Event |
Price |
|---|---|---|
Aug 26, 2009 |
Listed |
$709,900 |
Aug 16, 2009 |
Delisted |
* |
Jun 11, 2009 |
Price Changed |
* |
May 12, 2009 |
Listed |
* |
Apr 18, 2009 |
Delisted |
* |
Apr 17, 2009 |
Price Changed |
* |
Oct 18, 2008 |
Listed |
* |
Oct 01, 2008 |
Delisted |
* |
Jun 03, 2008 |
Sold |
$644,100 |
May 02, 2008 |
Listed |
* |
Dec 07, 2005 |
Sold |
$163,000 |
Apr 18, 2003 |
Sold |
$112,000 |
Jun 29, 1990 |
Sold |
$56,000 |
Some folks are crazy about big old Victorian wrecks. But even the most battle-hardened Victorian restorer knows better than to spend $709,900 on an ugly, run-down house whose environs have been rezoned to accommodate laundromats and tailors and tiremongers, with a concrete front-yard and no fence. This property is essentially unsellable as a primary residence, which is very sad, but c'est la vie.
The bank may as well do a good deed and just donate the building to someone who could use it to run a not-for-profit law practice, child care center, or custom t-shirt design shop. Anything but a house.
The bank may as well do a good deed and just donate the building to someone who could use it to run a not-for-profit law practice, child care center, or custom t-shirt design shop. Anything but a house.
Miscellaneous