Men at work--545 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, CA
The art of flipping is still alive and well, in spite of the market's current malaise. Today's flip is a large Victorian in an area noted for its small lots and tiny homes, the 400-500 blocks of Santa Clara. First, the specs:
I can't vouch for this, but this property doesn't look like it was born a multi-family residence. I'd bet it was raised and chopped up into two units at some point in its long history, and as a result it looks just wrong, especially when you compare it to real two-story Victorians on the island.
The sale history reveals truly inspired financial reasoning on the owner's part:
Except there are a lot of other pretty Victorian MFHs, some with 4 units (and therefore much better rental upside potential; at least you're not losing 50% of your revenue when one tenant moves out), many in better areas, most about the same size, that just aren't selling, even when listed for a lot less than this property's delusional $819,000 asking price.
Did anyone do a cash flow analysis of this beast? A quick back-of-the-envelope calculation puts the mortgage alone at $4,700 / month (assuming 10% down and 6.5% loan); add $700 for property tax and $500 for maintenance (a low estimate to reflect the fact the house was just renovated) and you need $5,900 / month in rent just to break even. I don't know about you, but I ain't paying $3,000 a month to live in a Vic basement in that part of town, even if I can use the long driveway to practice my bowling skills all day. And if all you want is a big house to live in for yourself, you can rent one just 5 sqft smaller for $3,500 a month. That's close to $30,000 savings every year, or tuition and board at any good 4-year public college in California.
Restoring old homes is a wonderful, laudable enterprise. Expecting to flip them for a massive profit is not. I just hope this doesn't cost these idiots' kids a chance to get the good education their parents obviously didn't get. Or maybe they skipped the intro math classes.
Update 10/31/08: It didn't take long for the first price drop. We're down to a still excessive $780,000. I'm almost ready to bet there's going to be another one before the end of November.
4 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, 2,366 sqft, 7,120-sqft lot, 1x2BR, 1x3BR units, MLS(r) #40374744, $819,000I don't know about gorgeous, but there's photographic evidence it was being worked on not terribly long ago, thanks to Google's ruthless street view camera:
Gorgeous Victorian on a huge lot. Totally remodeled from top to bottom with permits. New appliances, flooring, granite counter tops, cabinets, fresh paint in and out, etc. [...] Long driveway parks many cars.
I can't vouch for this, but this property doesn't look like it was born a multi-family residence. I'd bet it was raised and chopped up into two units at some point in its long history, and as a result it looks just wrong, especially when you compare it to real two-story Victorians on the island.The sale history reveals truly inspired financial reasoning on the owner's part:
I suspect it went something like this: "Let's buy this place, spend a hundred K fixing it up, and flip it! We're gonna be RICH! MUAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAAAA!"Last sale and tax info
- Sold 11/15/2006: $560,000
- 2007 Property Tax: $2,023
Except there are a lot of other pretty Victorian MFHs, some with 4 units (and therefore much better rental upside potential; at least you're not losing 50% of your revenue when one tenant moves out), many in better areas, most about the same size, that just aren't selling, even when listed for a lot less than this property's delusional $819,000 asking price.
Did anyone do a cash flow analysis of this beast? A quick back-of-the-envelope calculation puts the mortgage alone at $4,700 / month (assuming 10% down and 6.5% loan); add $700 for property tax and $500 for maintenance (a low estimate to reflect the fact the house was just renovated) and you need $5,900 / month in rent just to break even. I don't know about you, but I ain't paying $3,000 a month to live in a Vic basement in that part of town, even if I can use the long driveway to practice my bowling skills all day. And if all you want is a big house to live in for yourself, you can rent one just 5 sqft smaller for $3,500 a month. That's close to $30,000 savings every year, or tuition and board at any good 4-year public college in California.
Restoring old homes is a wonderful, laudable enterprise. Expecting to flip them for a massive profit is not. I just hope this doesn't cost these idiots' kids a chance to get the good education their parents obviously didn't get. Or maybe they skipped the intro math classes.
Update 10/31/08: It didn't take long for the first price drop. We're down to a still excessive $780,000. I'm almost ready to bet there's going to be another one before the end of November.
Leave a comment